Accelerators for K-REND FT

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure how the batch mixer mixes it as I never used that type of machine. @owls will tell I he had one.

Krend ft certainly does work better if it is mixed twice as stated on the bag but egrade and k1 will be different to ft and ft won't be going any where near a pump asbit won't mix or convey
Yep I used it with batch mixers in the past a v2 and sp11,
We had nothing but problems with it, hence we've never used it since.
For me it's the quality of sand they use quarried from Larne it's not very good.
The rep has given me a pallet of k1 for nothing to get me back on with it, but it's still in my unit, that tells its own story. It's a shame because there base render such as hp12 etc are a good product but there top coats are dross.
Our problem was shade variations in the batches aswell this was 2009 so they may have rectified it by now, but why take the chance with good renders such as monorex, enewall, pral m etc about.
 
Spoke to him yesterday and basically he said it can be a one coat application but pretty much all substrates bar dense block have to have a pre base ie hpx- hp12/14 which basically makes it two coat but suppose same with webber/rendaid and parex
 
Spoke to him yesterday and basically he said it can be a one coat application but pretty much all substrates bar dense block have to have a pre base ie hpx- hp12/14 which basically makes it two coat but suppose same with webber/rendaid and parex

I thought it was a 2 coat after speaking with Steve in Ireland. Treat as sand and cement he advised but buoldbase wanted alot more than sand and cement prices.

Weber OCR Parex parmurex etc can be applied straight to the substrate in one coat finished coated with acrylic or paint will be warranted.
 
Accelerators for K-REND FT
 
I thought it was a 2 coat after speaking with Steve in Ireland. Treat as sand and cement he advised but buoldbase wanted alot more than sand and cement prices.

Weber OCR Parex parmurex etc can be applied straight to the substrate in one coat finished coated with acrylic or paint will be warranted.
That's one of the specs I've been given
One coat of gpmortar
 
We always pre base every thing unless dense block, it gets charged and top quality job.

So how would they guarantee shrinkage from suction on hack off or celcon?

Or on old face brick that it won't blow?

I know what your saying about s&c prices compared to any bagged system but most of our work revolves around hacking off failed render or new build on celcon or render face brick.
My days of hand balling a 40m flank with s&c are a thing of the past when you can do the same pumping on in half the time and get another 40m on on top of that
 
Load of bollox really isn't it?

What was the spec before they made gp mortar lol [emoji12][emoji106]

They'll spec whatever is needed to sell more gear
If agree with that but ultimately it's more for us.
Charge accordingly and clean up.
We don't compete with the traditional and used to hand ball tonnes of it on 10 years ago
 
Load of bollox really isn't it?

What was the spec before they made gp mortar lol [emoji12][emoji106]

They'll spec whatever is needed to sell more gear

I've stuck to using UF base it can be done in one coat and is really nice. The mortar is just a cheaper product but buildbase are cashing in on the mark up I think. I pay 5.25 for OCR the kmix would need to be 3 to 4 would it not? Buildbase want about 6.90
 
So did I, all handball, used less of it in recent years in Ireland.
A lot of people actually use k rend as a sand/cement replacement for top coating for a knap finish.
It looks good, and goes twice as far as its on lots thinner.
Just to save them painting.

If you were to go by specs on self builds it would never get used at all over here on houses
 
I've stuck to using UF base it can be done in one coat and is really nice. The mortar is just a cheaper product but buildbase are cashing in on the mark up I think. I pay 5.25 for OCR the kmix would need to be 3 to 4 would it not? Buildbase want about 6.90
Do they spec that on celcon?

Sig do it cheap all the systems work out about the same give or take but sometimes worth paying bit more, sometimes not
 
So did I, all handball, used less of it in recent years in Ireland.
A lot of people actually use k rend as a sand/cement replacement for top coating for a knap finish.
It looks good, and goes twice as far as its on lots thinner.
Just to save them painting.

If you were to go by specs on self builds it would never get used at all over here on houses

Fair enough
We try and stick to the high end guarantee everything just peace of mind I guess.
 
7n block most commercial buildings we do.

House builders using 3.6 or 4 it seems I was only saying that on here about wrong block getting used on houses
 
7n block most commercial buildings we do.

House builders using 3.6 or 4 it seems I was only saying that on here about wrong block getting used on houses
7n blocks are minimum to render straight into but IMO unless they were dense concretes we would still want to base/ fully mesh the lot.
Or get rep to spec it but just stops suction and shrinkage
I suppose just the way we work.
 
7n blocks are minimum to render straight into but IMO unless they were dense concretes we would still want to base/ fully mesh the lot.
Or get rep to spec it but just stops suction and shrinkage
I suppose just the way we work.

You shouldn't ever get shrinkage on 7n with Parex or Weber. We use a warranted spec direct to that block for years. Less than 7n and you need microgobetis or rendaid.

All blockwork meshed regardless of strength
 
What's this 7n business fellas?
Educate me!
It's the compressive strength of a block under 7 and spec will be a base product.

Still get 7n that look like lightweight but as said we base and mesh pretty much all jobs.
Kills suction too.
I know they spec that it can go on with certified guarantee for product but we always go full works unless conkers
 
What would 4 inch solids be then?

Can be either mate.
Usually u can tell with the weight of them.

There low suction so u get plenty of time where as 3.6n suck in like B####

7n takes a pass with your mesh then a top out and sits nice, sometimes on lower strength you can be chasing it.
You don't see many cracks in 7s or above where as with 3.6s there is a crack in every building before u render see pic
 

Attachments

  • Accelerators for K-REND FT
    1436211946540.webp
    146.2 KB · Views: 273
Can be either mate.
Usually u can tell with the weight of them.

There low suction so u get plenty of time where as 3.6n suck in like B####

7n takes a pass with your mesh then a top out and sits nice, sometimes on lower strength you can be chasing it.
You don't see many cracks in 7s or above where as with 3.6s there is a crack in every building before u render see pic

the problem is now aswell is the compostion of 3.6n blocks bits of recycled glass coal allorts of rubbish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top