Have a 1930's solid brick concrete floor terrace and have taken the ceilings down and walls back to brick. The wall is a flemish bond solid wall, really dusty and a draft can be felt through some of the gaps in the mortar.
Having read up a bit I wanted to sand and cement with a good glug of sbr + plasticiser and after adequate drying time of a week or so 2 top coats of multi finish. I hear this is what building control would recommend for the age of building and I could potentially be faced with a large fine if they got word I skimped on proper damp and draft protection to the brickwork.
Anyway.. had a couple of plasterers round for some quotes and they're all like "what u wanna do that for?" insisting dot and dab straight onto the crumbly brick "is the way forward", cheaper and quicker. I totted up the materials and I would argue that boarding is more expensive, especially if they are insulated board which building regs would want to see on external facing walls.
I'm not so keen on living in a plasterboard tent and feel sand and cement would be more in keeping with the age and type of building. With the difference in air temperature behind the boards I don't want to encourage drafts whistling through the sockets and light switches and I also want to hang a heavy 65 inch TV, kitchen cabinets etc to the wall. I also think plasterboard feels cheap compared to a good solid wall and offers less sound proofing and taking the wall out so far would eat up valuable real estate. It may also be harder to amend electrics / plumbing if I had to dig a channel in the wall in the future.
Basically what I'm asking is have I overlooked anything with dot and dab other than someone trying to offer a quick and dirty solution?
Having read up a bit I wanted to sand and cement with a good glug of sbr + plasticiser and after adequate drying time of a week or so 2 top coats of multi finish. I hear this is what building control would recommend for the age of building and I could potentially be faced with a large fine if they got word I skimped on proper damp and draft protection to the brickwork.
Anyway.. had a couple of plasterers round for some quotes and they're all like "what u wanna do that for?" insisting dot and dab straight onto the crumbly brick "is the way forward", cheaper and quicker. I totted up the materials and I would argue that boarding is more expensive, especially if they are insulated board which building regs would want to see on external facing walls.
I'm not so keen on living in a plasterboard tent and feel sand and cement would be more in keeping with the age and type of building. With the difference in air temperature behind the boards I don't want to encourage drafts whistling through the sockets and light switches and I also want to hang a heavy 65 inch TV, kitchen cabinets etc to the wall. I also think plasterboard feels cheap compared to a good solid wall and offers less sound proofing and taking the wall out so far would eat up valuable real estate. It may also be harder to amend electrics / plumbing if I had to dig a channel in the wall in the future.
Basically what I'm asking is have I overlooked anything with dot and dab other than someone trying to offer a quick and dirty solution?
Last edited: