Its true you will not find proof of RD anywhere I challenge you to find me solid proof and i will change my mind
i had one year before last, not sure but i reckon i popped it on here and we had some discussion on it, hydrostatic pressure was mentioned...
old, old house...
floor been re-concreted..
damp been 'treated' before on one wall by hacking off and re-rendering 3:1 - hard as f'ck... im guessing waterproofer..
this walls a 9" party wall, no the other side wasnt built at a later date (trust me, checked) BUT the floor level on the other side WAS about 12" higher...
now, the (new, well 10 year old) concrete didnt have a break, went right up to the brickwork, couldnt find a membrane..
couldnt find a dpc either...
removed the skirting and its rendered to the floor, dont forget its rock hard very resistant to the passage of water..
the PROBLEM was, the new render was a metre high, dead on...
above the render was a line of damp about 300mm wide/high on ONE side of the wall only...
other side WASNT bridged - checked....
they'd had a bathroom leak in the past, 2 years ago, i repaired some of the plaster in the hallway due to this leak - bone dry...
question - how did the damp get to be where it was? absolutely no sign of damp on the other side, the 'higher floor' side...
had me scratchring my head to come up with anything other than 'rising damp' or water/moisture soaking 'up' the wall from the dodgy floor levels and manifesting itself ABOVE the waterproof render... must have happened after the 'treatment' or they'd have hacked off 1300 wouldnt they?
p.s. once i'd hacked off the 'bridge' behind the skirting board (thats how i know how hard the render was) the perps in the bricks behind were pure mush, i raked some out with a pen... funnily enough, the floor looked dry :RpS_bored: