Crypto may well have a future, but, at this point in time, there are multiple competing crypto platforms and it doesn't matter how advanced the progamming may be - for any of them to have robust potential, during challenging economic times, they must be asset-backed with real physical assets of genuine value, not just digital ones and zeros. I strongly suspect that current cryptos are probably controlled experiments, to test the water, rather than being the genuine 'competition' to the banking oligcarchs they are claimed to be. I say this because those oligarchs are, at this point in time, still far too powerful to be so easily competed against. Furthermore, many of the current banking oligarchs would actually like to see the world move over to entirely digital currency, because then Joe Bloggs is much more vulnerable than if he can use cash.
I'm not an expert in investing, but investing is built on bubbles of nothing nested within other bubbles of nothing, like an onion. It's 99% gambling on derivatives and fictions. Stock-brokers and bankers know this. They just don't give a fck - they'll keep squeezing the lemon again and again and again until the whole house of cards collapses, and then they'll expect the public purse, around the world, to pick up the pieces and give them an opportunity to exploit some other house of cards. Greed begets greed begets greed begets greed begets greed, ad-infinitum. Only very naive people would invest heavily in current cryptos in the belief that they are genuine competition to the current paradigm.