Luis Suarez as a child !?

Status
Not open for further replies.
owls said:
I think biting some one, is a different league to intentional leg breaking tackles and how do you prove someone is doing it intentionally and not going for the ball, Keane on alf Inge Harland is the only example I can think of, and I agre I would have charged Keane as he wrote it in his autobigraphy what his intention was ,but you can't say biting someone like that was an accident. It's a contact sport so injurys are par the course, as a result of playing, but that cretin did it in a moment of madness, then for him to go down as the inured party is pathetic.
If it was a sheffield Wednesday player I'd want the club to hang him out to dry, granted he's worth millions but so are Liverpool, and I'd want to get rid and cut there losses for the shame he's brought on to the club, they stood by him before I wouldn't do it again.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately the reality is the money invested in him and the potential success he brings bare in mind he is in the top 3 players in the world means Liverpool or any other club I don't care who that are would still play a player of that calibre. Money talks.

I think many challenges can be seen on TV with pure intent to injure. Enuff evidence on the cameras. You can see what is a late challenge or a clumsy challenge and you can see when a player takes a man with no target on the ball.
 
Problem is money talks and he's a proven goal scorer, so someone will take him on. It's the same with marlin king convicted of rape and been to prison 3 times Watford then Coventry took him on when he was released from prison, now he's a sheffield united officially but he's in jail again at moment. Until fans bycott nothing will change.
 
plasterjfe said:
Unfortunately the reality is the money invested in him and the potential success he brings bare in mind he is in the top 3 players in the world means Liverpool or any other club I don't care who that are would still play a player of that calibre. Money talks.

I think many challenges can be seen on TV with pure intent to injure. Enuff evidence on the cameras. You can see what is a late challenge or a clumsy challenge and you can see when a player takes a man with no target on the ball.
Click to expand...

money does talk, and it just sums up what wrong with the game. Difference between clumsy and intentional, I don't buy the argument that some players intentially set out to mame players on the pitch

any how Suarez ain't top 3 for me, after messi, Ronaldo, neymar, bale, xavi,van persie, ibrahimovic, in top 10 like, but you can argue all day about that.
 
Totally agree owls, what some of the Liverpool fans are dismissing is the morality of his actions. The amount of ex players still connected with the club week in week out shows what a great place it is and was and should be in the future so good riddance.
 
He's a loony........... Liverpool should sack him and sue him for loss of revenue, strip him of every penny he has. Then section the tvvat :RpS_thumbup:
 
jamesthefirst said:
Totally agree owls, what some of the Liverpool fans are dismissing is the morality of his actions. The amount of ex players still connected with the club week in week out shows what a great place it is and was and should be in the future so good riddance.
Click to expand...

Yep liverpool are a great traditional club, and I think it tarnishes them, but I'm not a Liverpool supporter, so I may be off the mark.
 
Liverpool will probably appeal the domestic ban. The club are his employer and he was released from duty when the action took place.
Luke any employer that expect him to do what they pay him for when he returns to duty.

Only Ronaldo and messi on that list. The others I am afraid he has eclipsed now last season cemented that. Next season maybe he will drop back considering he won't be playing the start.

Players maim other players every week.

Ray Wilkins even said he was disappointed that when England played uraguay that not one player even "tested" the injured knee of Suarez to see if it was "legit". It is a fact of football it is a part of the game
 
plasterjfe said:
Liverpool will probably appeal the domestic ban. The club are his employer and he was released from duty when the action took place.
Luke any employer that expect him to do what they pay him for when he returns to duty.

Only Ronaldo and messi on that list. The others I am afraid he has eclipsed now last season cemented that. Next season maybe he will drop back considering he won't be playing the start.

Players maim other players every week.

Ray Wilkins even said he was disappointed that when England played uraguay that not one player even "tested" the injured knee of Suarez to see if it was "legit". It is a fact of football it is a part of the game
Click to expand...

:RpS_unsure:
 
owls said:
I think biting some one, is a different league to intentional leg breaking tackles and how do you prove someone is doing it intentionally and not going for the ball, Keane on alf Inge Harland is the only example I can think of, and I agre I would have charged Keane as he wrote it in his autobigraphy what his intention was ,but you can't say biting someone like that was an accident. It's a contact sport so injurys are par the course, as a result of playing, but that cretin did it in a moment of madness, then for him to go down as the inured party is pathetic.
If it was a sheffield Wednesday player I'd want the club to hang him out to dry, granted he's worth millions but so are Liverpool, and I'd want to get rid and cut there losses for the shame he's brought on to the club, they stood by him before I wouldn't do it again.
Click to expand...

Completely agree with you owls. Yet again they will brush it off, whilst making itlook like theyre concerned. as hes a money maker

Ban for life. Although I know it wont happen. Fucck him. Cunnt.
 
If you look at the financial fair play scenario it's means zero. PSG got fined £50 million then go and spend the same on Luiz from Chelsea. I thought part if the fine restricted and future transfers for 2 years.... It's clearly all b*ll***s
 
beddy said:
Completely agree with you owls. Yet again they will brush it off, whilst making itlook like theyre concerned. as hes a money maker

Ban for life. Although I know it wont happen. Fucck him. Cunnt.
Click to expand...

join in my club then and boycott anything he's associated with.....money talks, it's the only way!
 
he should have all his teeth pulled then hes allowed to play.........that or a ban for life his choice
 
Yeah I would be happy with the muzzle or the teeth out.
Uruguay and the whole set up ain't a good environment for him tbh. Last season when came back he was impeccable and its like he goes over there and all the hard work is undone.

Maybe Steve peters should have stayed with him rather than waste his time on the england.
I ain't crying into my milk about it tho.
It's a choice of watching one of the top 3players in the world every week in the premier league or not. So any punishment that's keeps him on the field suits me. In fact these is no other player I would sooner watch. On that note fetch the pliers....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

Back
Top