I'm having some work done on my house and I'm worried that the guys doing it aren't doing a great job, but I'm not an expert at these things and any time I query anything they have a very ready excuse/explanation which could be fair enough but could also be total rubbish! I'm hoping someone on here could give me their opinion, as I don't want to be an unreasonable person who complains about things that can't be helped, I appreciate that in older houses there are always problems and things can't always be perfect, but I'm becoming more and more worried that they're cutting corners and fobbing me off because they think I won't know any better. Here are my concerns:
1. When the old tiles were taken off one of the bathroom walls, it turned out that the plaster underneath was very old and all came away with the tiles (it basically crumbled as soon as it was touched). This wasn't unexpected - the tiles had been up a very long time and I'd had no idea of the quality of the plaster underneath. It's a lat and plaster wall, so they fixed some plasterboard onto the section where the old tiles were and left the rest of the wall as it was. They've put the new tiles straight over the plasterboard, and several people have said to me (including a neighbour who used to be a bathroom fitter) that it should really have been skimmed first - is this right?
2. We also wanted the tiles to go right up to the ceiling rather than just partway up like the old ones did, and they've put the new tiles straight onto the old plaster despite it obviously being in really poor condition. I was surprised by this and queried it, but they said there was no reason not to do this. OK, or not?
3. When they first fixed the tiles to the wall, we noticed a fairly obvious bulge partway up the wall over the plasterboard, and another section at the side and top (over the old plaster) which was so far out from the wall I could stick my finger behind it - when we spoke to the tiler about this, he said that it was because the wall underneath wasn't completely flat (this being the wall that they'd fixed plasterboard onto) and talked about old houses with lat & plaster walls being impossible to tile without there being some bulges. He also said that as we'd chosen small tiles (15x15cm) this made it impossible to tile over an uneven wall without there being any bulges - although he hadn't said anything like this to me when I told him what tiles I was thinking of getting and asked if they'd be OK. I appreciate that walls in old houses aren't always flat, but the quote they gave me included making sure all walls were suitable for tiling - surely if the wall they'd fixed plasterboard to still wasn't flat, they should have done something about that before tiling it??
If anyone can offer their thoughts, that'd be great.
We eventually got him to agree to re-do one small area (12 tiles) at the bottom of the wall where the tiles are built out so far
1. When the old tiles were taken off one of the bathroom walls, it turned out that the plaster underneath was very old and all came away with the tiles (it basically crumbled as soon as it was touched). This wasn't unexpected - the tiles had been up a very long time and I'd had no idea of the quality of the plaster underneath. It's a lat and plaster wall, so they fixed some plasterboard onto the section where the old tiles were and left the rest of the wall as it was. They've put the new tiles straight over the plasterboard, and several people have said to me (including a neighbour who used to be a bathroom fitter) that it should really have been skimmed first - is this right?
2. We also wanted the tiles to go right up to the ceiling rather than just partway up like the old ones did, and they've put the new tiles straight onto the old plaster despite it obviously being in really poor condition. I was surprised by this and queried it, but they said there was no reason not to do this. OK, or not?
3. When they first fixed the tiles to the wall, we noticed a fairly obvious bulge partway up the wall over the plasterboard, and another section at the side and top (over the old plaster) which was so far out from the wall I could stick my finger behind it - when we spoke to the tiler about this, he said that it was because the wall underneath wasn't completely flat (this being the wall that they'd fixed plasterboard onto) and talked about old houses with lat & plaster walls being impossible to tile without there being some bulges. He also said that as we'd chosen small tiles (15x15cm) this made it impossible to tile over an uneven wall without there being any bulges - although he hadn't said anything like this to me when I told him what tiles I was thinking of getting and asked if they'd be OK. I appreciate that walls in old houses aren't always flat, but the quote they gave me included making sure all walls were suitable for tiling - surely if the wall they'd fixed plasterboard to still wasn't flat, they should have done something about that before tiling it??
If anyone can offer their thoughts, that'd be great.
We eventually got him to agree to re-do one small area (12 tiles) at the bottom of the wall where the tiles are built out so far