What do you disagree with on these policies?

flynnyman said:
Nearly every post on this thread :) I have pulled you on everyone of them and proved your lying, have a read of the links.
Click to expand...


No you haven't, you may think you have but the reality is this my posts stand up where as yours like the Labour Party just bomb
 
gps said:
No you haven't, you may think you have but the reality is this my posts stand up where as yours like the Labour Party just bomb
Click to expand...
Keep lying Gordon it's making you look even stupider than I thought you were, I've pulled every lie you told in this thread and gave you facts and you ignored them it's that simple.
 
flynnyman said:
If the alternative can be done by conservative then so can this? McDonald's are getting rid of zero hour contracts and offering 115 000 contracts so that's a start :)
Click to expand...
Try to replicate it across the country and the unemployment will triple, at least. None government will want to see it during its mandate.
 
flynnyman said:
Why would it triple?
Click to expand...


Because unless they accept 1 hour contracts it's not feasible to take part time/flexible staff on any more hours if the business can't sustain it. So no jobs the upside I guess is plenty of overtime available
 
gps said:
Because unless they accept 1 hour contracts it's not feasible to take part time/flexible staff on any more hours if the business can't sustain it. So no jobs the upside I guess is plenty of overtime available
Click to expand...
You talk some s**t, you remember saying in another post regarding pricing and profit if you're not making any you should shut shop? Well the same should apply to big business if they can't work their business employing staff they should shut up shop.
 
flynnyman said:
You talk some s**t, you remember saying in another post regarding pricing and profit if you're not making any you should shut shop? Well the same should apply to big business if they can't work their business employing staff they should shut up shop.
Click to expand...


Any business should have the flexibility to hire flexible staff to assist as and when business demands it, I use a labourer whenever I need him and we I don't need him I just say no work this week buddy, works great.
 
gps said:
Any business should have the flexibility to hire flexible staff to assist as and when business demands it, I use a labourer whenever I need him and we I don't need him I just say no work this week buddy, works great.
Click to expand...
And I bet he is scratching on?
 
flynnyman said:
Why would it triple?
Click to expand...
I have mentioned it before that self employment and 0 hour contract is the mask for unemployed. It's very clear! 45% of the self employment is very low paid , which serves the employers very well, so is the zero h and makes them basically unemployed in my point, cos you can't leave normal life with unknown income.The majority are leaving in poverty and that's far away from being employed. Last time I checked, I might be wrong tho, unemployment was around 4-5%, zero h - about 1 million and self employed- 4.8 million-15%. Based on this, I would say companies won't employ as many as now if they have to guarantee living standard income, or if they do , as you said, they will go busted,which again is not good for employment numbers.
 
vfr12 said:
I have mentioned it before that self employment and 0 hour contract is the mask for unemployed. It's very clear! 45% of the self employment is very low paid , which serves the employers very well, so is the zero h and makes them basically unemployed in my point, cos you can't leave normal life with unknown income.The majority are leaving in poverty and that's far away from being employed. Last time I checked, I might be wrong tho, unemployment was around 4-5%, zero h - about 1 million and self employed- 4.8 million-15%. Based on this, I would say companies won't employ as many as now if they have to guarantee living standard income, or if they do , as you said, they will go busted,which again is not good for employment numbers.
Click to expand...
And majority of zero hour contracts will be on some sort of benefit so it brings us back round to what is the major drain on our taxes and causing the deficit becuase non workers are only a small part of it. It's much deeper than that
 
stuart23 said:
And majority of zero hour contracts will be on some sort of benefit so it brings us back round to what is the major drain on our taxes and causing the deficit becuase non workers are only a small part of it. It's much deeper than that
Click to expand...


Will be lol, zero evidence to back your claim
 
How's the game going :estudioso:
What do you disagree with on these policies?
 
gps said:
Ok for last time, zero hours are mainly used for people who want the flexibility to work as and when, not as you and others peddle as being full time employment
Click to expand...
Read the links I've posted we are going round in circles, they are not mainly used for people who want flexibility they are used by big business who want flexibility, that's the problem. We are not talking builders here we are talking big business, who use the benefit system to top up earnings to a so called living wage. These companies don't invest they just take out look at BHS as an example.
 
flynnyman said:
Read the links I've posted we are going round in circles, they are not mainly used for people who want flexibility they are used by big business who want flexibility, that's the problem. We are not talking builders here we are talking big business, who use the benefit system to top up earnings to a so called living wage. These companies don't invest they just take out look at BHS as an example.
Click to expand...



Actually you are going round in circles o_O
 
vfr12 said:
I have mentioned it before that self employment and 0 hour contract is the mask for unemployed. It's very clear! 45% of the self employment is very low paid , which serves the employers very well, so is the zero h and makes them basically unemployed in my point, cos you can't leave normal life with unknown income.The majority are leaving in poverty and that's far away from being employed. Last time I checked, I might be wrong tho, unemployment was around 4-5%, zero h - about 1 million and self employed- 4.8 million-15%. Based on this, I would say companies won't employ as many as now if they have to guarantee living standard income, or if they do , as you said, they will go busted,which again is not good for employment numbers.
Click to expand...
They won't go bust they will grow with a happier workforce, it's a myth they will move as @gps likes to say, they won't go anywhere. Also taking certain things back into public ownership will be a lot better, can't remember which train line went into public ownership and started making a profit so the tories changed it to make a loss but not for the share holders.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Back
Top